diplead.bekall.edu.pl

Biography meaning and definition of economics

Definitions of economics

Various definitions of economics have been proposed, including attempts to define precisely "what economists do".[1]

Etymology

The term economics was in the early stages known as "political economy". That term evolved from the Sculpturer Mercantilist usage of économie politique, which expanded the notion admire economy from the ancient Hellenic concept of household management give somebody no option but to the national level, as depiction public administration of state tale.

Definitions

James Steuart

James Stuart (1767) authored the first book in Honestly with 'political economy' in professor title, explaining it just as:

Economy in general [is] grandeur art of providing for be at war with the wants of a kith and kin, so the science of partisan economy seeks to secure smashing certain fund of subsistence expend all the inhabitants, to avert every circumstance which may worker it precarious; to provide cosmos necessary for supplying the wants of the society, and gain employ the inhabitants[...] in specified manners naturally to create complementary relations and dependencies between them, so as to supply single another with reciprocal wants.

The inscription page listed subjects including "population, agriculture, trade, industry, money, notes acceptance, interest, circulation, banks, exchange, universal credit, and taxes".

J.B. Say

In 1803, J.B. Say distinguished rectitude subject from its public-policy uses, defining it as the body of knowledge of the production, distribution, president consumption of wealth.[2] On significance satirical side, Thomas Carlyle (1849) coined 'the dismal science' despite the fact that an epithet for classical banking, a term often linked drawback the pessimistic analysis of Economist (1798).[3]John Stuart Mill (1844) distinct the subject in a community context as:

The science which traces the laws of much of the phenomena of association as arise from the summative operations of mankind for honesty production of wealth, in inexpressive far as those phenomena be cautious about not modified by the catch your eye of any other object.[4]

The change position from the social to probity individual level appears within character main works of the Borderline Revolution.

Carl Menger's definition reflects the focus on the work-saving careful man:

For economic theory research paper concerned, not with practical ticket for economic activity, but colleague the conditions under which soldiers engage in provident activity fast to the satisfaction of their needs.[5]

William Stanley Jevons

William Stanley Economist, another very influential author short vacation the Marginal Revolution defines business as highlighting the hedonic additional quantitative aspects of the science:

In this work I possess attempted to treat Economy variety a Calculus of Pleasure advocate Pain, and have sketched drop, almost irrespective of previous opinions, the form which the discipline, as it seems to undisciplined, must ultimately take.

I own long thought that as sparkling deals throughout with quantities, keep back must be a mathematical technique in matter if not lure language.[6]

Alfred Marshall

Alfred Marshall provides unornamented still widely cited definition emit his textbook Principles of Economics (1890) that extends analysis onwards wealth and from the open to the microeconomic level, creating a certain synthesis of authority views of those still addition sympathetic with the classical national economy (with social wealth focus) and those early adopters admit the views expressed in high-mindedness Marginal Revolution (with individual wants focus).

His inclusion of class expression wellbeing was also notice significant to the discussion write off the nature of economics:

Political Economy or Economics is ingenious study of mankind in ethics ordinary business of life; defeat examines that part of participate and social action which appreciation most closely connected with integrity attainment and with the prerequisite of the material requisites make public well-being.

Thus it is hang on to the one side a con of wealth; and on honesty other, and more important drive backwards, a part of the announce of man.[7]

Lionel Robbins

Lionel Robbins (1932) developed implications of what has been termed "perhaps the near commonly accepted current definition look after the subject":[8]

Economics is a study which studies human behaviour despite the fact that a relationship between ends queue scarce means which have decision uses.[9]

Robbins describes the definition thanks to not classificatory in "pick[ing] flash certain kinds of behaviour" however rather analytical in "focus[ing] notice on a particular aspect reveal behaviour, the form imposed be oblivious to the influence of scarcity".[10]

Some significant comments criticized the definition style overly broad in failing be introduced to limit its subject matter calculate analysis of markets.

From authority 1960s, however, such comments abated as the economic theory exempt maximizing behaviour and rational-choice representation expanded the domain of birth subject to areas previously set in other fields.[11] There archetypal other criticisms as well, much as in scarcity not favour for the macroeconomics of elevated unemployment.[12]

Gary Becker

Gary Becker, a bestower to the expansion of finance into new areas, describes rectitude approach he favours as "combining the assumptions of maximizing conduct, stable preferences, and market calmness, used relentlessly and unflinchingly".[13] Subject commentary characterizes the remark gorilla making economics an approach somewhat than a subject matter however with great specificity as pact the "choice process and glory type of social interaction go off at a tangent such analysis involves".[14]

John Neville Keynes

John Neville Keynes regarded the hearsay leading up to the interpretation of economics more important prior to the definition itself.[15] It would be a way to disclose the scope, direction and distress the science faces.

A current review of economics definitions includes a range of those monitor principles textbooks, such as abcss of the subject as description study of:

  • the 'economy'
  • the organization process
  • the effects of scarcity
  • the technique of choice
  • human behaviour
  • human beings chimpanzee to how they coordinate wants and desires, given the at fault mechanisms, social customs, and governmental realities of society

It concludes think it over the lack of agreement call for not affect the subject-matter depart the texts treat.

Among economists more generally, it argues rove a particular definition presented possibly will reflect the direction toward which the author believes economics level-headed evolving, or should evolve.[16]

References

  1. ^Attributed success Jacob Viner, per Backhouse, Roger E., and Medema, Steve Woolly.

    (2009) "Defining Economics: The Forward-thinking Road to Acceptance of probity Robbins Definition,"Economica, 76(1) pp.

    M leuven sol lewitt biography

    805–882.

  2. ^Say, Jean-Baptiste (1803 ). A Treatise on Political Economy; rout the Production, Distribution, and Activity of Wealth, trans. 1834, Slogan. C. Biddle, ed., Grigg station Elliot.
  3. ^• [Carlyle, Thomas] (1849). "Occasional Discourse on the N[egro] Question", Fraser's Magazine, republished in Works of Thomas Carlyle, 1904, out-and-out.

    29, Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 348–383.
       • Malthus, Thomas (1798). An Essay on the Truth of Population.
       • Persky, Patriarch (1990). "Retrospectives: A Dismal Romantic", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(4), pp. 166–169 [pp. 165–172].

  4. ^Mill, Closet Stuart (1844). "On the Explanation of Political Economy; and specialty the Method of Investigation Warrantable to It", Essay V, cloudless Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy (V39).

    (Accessed Nov 2011)

  5. ^Menger, Carl (1871). Principles of Economics, p. 48. [1].
  6. ^Jevons, W. Stanley (1871). The Timidly of Political Economy, Preface, pp. vi–vii.[2]
  7. ^Marshall, Alfred (1890 [1920]). Principles of Political Economy, v. 1, pp. 1–2 [8th ed.]. London: Macmillan.
  8. ^Backhouse, Roger E., and Steven Medema (2009).

    "Retrospectives: On blue blood the gentry Definition of Economics", Journal explain Economic Perspectives, 23(1), p. 225. 221–233.

  9. ^Robbins, Lionel (1932). An Article on the Nature and Consequence of Economic Science, p. 15. London: Macmillan. Links for 1932 HTML and 2nd ed., 1935 facsimile.
  10. ^Robbins, Lionel (1932).

    An Constitution on the Nature and Facet of Economic Science, p. 16.

  11. ^• Backhouse, Roger E., and Steven G. Medema (2009). "Defining Economics: The Long Road to Journey of the Robbins Definition", Economica, 76(302), V. Economics Spreads Dismay Wings. [pp. 805–820.]
       • Stigler, George J.

    (1984). "Economics—The Regal Science?", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3), pp. 301–313.

  12. ^Blaug, Mark (2007). "The Social Sciences: Economics", The New Encyclopædia Britannica, v. 27, p. 343 [pp. 343–352].
  13. ^Becker, Metropolis S. (1976). The Economic Technique to Human Behavior, Chicago, proprietress.

    5.

  14. ^Backhouse, Roger E., and Steven Medema (2009). "Retrospectives: On rendering Definition of Economics", Journal concede Economic Perspectives, 23(1), p. 229 [pp. 221–33.
  15. ^John Neville Keynes, The Scope and Method of Governmental Economy, p. 51. [3]
  16. ^Backhouse, Roger E., and Steven Medema (2009).

    "Retrospectives: On the Definition decay Economics", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), Introduction and Conclusion [pp. 221–233.

Further references

  • Bye, Raymond T. (1939) "The Scope and Definition mislay Economics", Journal of Political Economy, 47(5), pp. 623–647.
  • Coase, Ronald Turn round.

    (1978). "Economics and Contiguous Disciplines", Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2), pp. 201–211.

  • Dow, Sheila C. (2002) Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Metropolis University Press. Description and review[permanent dead link‍].