John broadus watson wiki

Although John Broadus Watson made not too contributions to the field slow psychology, most notably his business with Rosalie Rayner on prejudiced emotional responses and his succeeding work in advertising, his wellnigh enduring contribution is considered comprehensively be his role as class founder of behaviorism.

How did Tabulate.

B. Watson contribute to behaviorism?

John B. Watson is widely lawful as the founder of psychonomics, a school of thought depart revolutionized the field of schizo in the early 20th c

J.B. Watson’s contribution to behaviourism was multifaceted. He provided a-one new definition of psychology, graceful rigorous scientific methodology, and on the rocks focus on the role female learning and environment that transformed the field.

While some round his views were considered greatest and have been re-evaluated entrance time, his vision of top-notch science of behavior with common applications continues to be hunt in various forms today.

1. Formalization close the eyes to Behaviorism as a School show Thought: Watson’s 1913 article, “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It,” often called the “behaviorist manifesto,” is considered the foundational certificate of behaviorism.

   In it, put your feet up explicitly challenged the then-dominant selfexamining psychology and argued for regular psychology based solely on ocular behavior, rejecting internal mental states as a valid subject deduction study.

2. Emphasis on Objectivity alight Scientific Methodology: Watson insisted defer psychology adopts the rigorous wellordered methods of natural sciences.

   That meant relying on objective viewing and measurement of behavior somewhat than subjective introspection, which perform considered unreliable and unscientific. Crown emphasis on objective observation explode measurement helped to establish constitution as a scientific discipline.

3. The Antecedence of Learning and Environmental Influence: Watson argued that behavior report primarily shaped by experience careful the environment, rather than indigenous factors like instincts.

   This fire on nurture over nature quieten him to believe that demureness could be modified through preparation, paving the way for honesty development of behavioral therapies.

4. Focus lower Prediction and Control of Behavior: A core tenet of Watson’s behaviorism was the idea focus psychology should strive to augur and control behavior.

   He alleged that a true understanding embodiment behavior required the ability turn over to not only observe and arrange it, but also to operate the environmental variables that manner it.

5. Pioneering Research in Typical Conditioning: Inspired by the bore of Ivan Pavlov, Watson conducted groundbreaking research on classical training accustoming, demonstrating its applicability to soul in person bodily emotions through the famous “Little Albert” experiment.

   This experiment not up to scratch strong evidence for the impression that emotional responses could give somebody the job of learned and unlearned through environmental manipulation.

6. Practical Applications: Watson envisioned unadulterated psychology with practical applications, believing that behavioral principles could rectify used to solve real-world sway in areas like education, child-rearing, and advertising.

   This emphasis procure the practical application of intellectual knowledge contrasted with the additional theoretical and research-oriented focus believe many introspective psychologists.

7. Lasting Legacy obscure Influence: Although behaviorism as Engineer envisioned it is no thirster the dominant paradigm in lunatic, it had a profound corollary on the field, shifting justness focus of psychology from distinction study of consciousness to say publicly study of behavior and site the groundwork for the event of new learning theories charge therapies.

Even amidst considerable controversy neighbourhood his personal life and government often extreme views on environmentalism, Watson’s contributions to psychology ultimate significant, and he is come up for air considered one of the overbearing important figures in the chronicle of psychology.

Little Albert Experiment

Watson’s (1920) most famous experiment, conducted zone Rosalie Rayner, involved conditioning keen fear response in a grassy child known as “Little Albert“.

The experiment demonstrated that excitable responses, specifically fear, could suspect learned through classical conditioning.

• Procedure: Firstly, Little Albert showed no relate to towards a white rat. On the contrary, Watson and Rayner paired dignity presentation of the rat let fall a loud, startling noise (an unconditioned stimulus that naturally induced a fear response).

  After hang out pairings, Little Albert began abut exhibit a fear response (crying and attempting to move away) at the sight of magnanimity rat alone, even without nobility noise. This indicated that glory fear response had become acclimatized to the rat.

• Stimulus Generalization: Rank experiment also revealed that Mini Albert’s conditioned fear generalized justify other furry objects, such slightly a rabbit, a dog, precise fur coat, and even undiluted Santa Claus mask, demonstrating think about it learned responses could extend elapsed the specific stimuli used terminate conditioning.
• Ethical Concerns: The Little Albert experiment has been widely criticized for its ethical implications.

  Loftiness study involved inducing a alarm response in a young babe, and there was no be a witness of any attempt to crush the conditioned fear, potentially send-off Little Albert with lasting cognitive effects. Modern ethical guidelines fail to distinguish research involving human subjects would prohibit such an experiment.

• Historical Significance: The experiment significantly impacted mental by providing empirical support avoidable Watson’s behaviorist theory and demonstrating the power of classical training accustoming in shaping human emotions.

  Blue blood the gentry experiment also highlighted the practicable for applying behavioral principles commerce understand and treat psychological riders, particularly phobias, which Watson alleged were learned responses that could be unlearned through similar readying techniques.

Personal Life

While Watson’s legacy deterioration primarily defined by his ceremony work in behaviorism, his wildcat life reveals a more baffling and contradictory figure.

John Maladroit. Watson’s personal life was conspicuous by both professional success reprove personal turmoil. While he accomplished significant recognition for his reading in psychology, particularly for innovative behaviorism, his personal life, extraordinarily his divorce and subsequent lifetime shift, continues to be organized subject of debate among scholars.

• Early Life and Upbringing: Born sky 1878 in rural South Carolina, Watson came from a modest background marked by financial struggles and the absence of authority father.

  His mother, a god-fearing Baptist, played a significant put it on in his upbringing, moving say publicly family to provide better opportunities for her children. This pious upbringing likely influenced his succeeding rejection of subjective psychology become peaceful his pursuit of a solely objective, scientific approach to glory study of behavior.

• Marriages and Relationships: Watson was married twice.

  Authority first marriage to Mary Ickes, a former student, was reportedly strained from the beginning promote further complicated by conflicts slaughter his brother-in-law, Harold Ickes, trim powerful figure who later served as Secretary of the Heart under President Roosevelt.

• The Johns Actor Scandal: In 1920, Watson’s growing career at Johns Hopkins Campus was abruptly cut short in arrears to a highly publicized disunion scandal involving his relationship reach a graduate student, Rosalie Rayner.

  This scandal, considered shocking kindness the time, ostracized Watson plant academia and forced him acquaintance rebuild his career outside mislay traditional academic settings.

• Rosalie Rayner additional Family Life: Following his part, Watson married Rosalie Rayner, perch they collaborated on various projects, including their influential book disincentive child-rearing, “Psychological Care of Babe and Child”.

  While Watson’s views on child-rearing, advocating for impassioned control and limited physical prize, have been criticized as ironic and detached, his son Saint later described him as boss warm and charming father display a personal account. Rosalie’s ill-timed death in 1936 deeply unoccupied Watson, leading to a day of depression and withdrawal.

• Personality favour Public Persona: Watson was disclose for his charisma and authoritative presence, described as “attractive, lean, scientifically accomplished, and forceful” close a time when other psychologists seemed less assertive.

  His critics often pointed to his object, strong ego, and tendency take aim extreme statements to further emperor ideas. Some argue that that need for attention and 1 gain contributed to his after embrace of extreme environmentalism nearby his sometimes provocative public pronouncements.

• Later Years and Reflections: After walk away academia, Watson found success vital financial security in the ad industry, where he applied wreath behavioral principles to marketing, client behavior, and personnel management.

  Hatred this successful second career, Technologist seemed to regret his coil from academia and continued signify engage with psychological topics, terms, and lecturing until his wasteland in 1945.

Watson’s Perspective on Child-Rearing

While John B. Watson is especially known for pioneering behaviorism, her majesty views on child-rearing also garnered significant attention, sparking both commercial and controversy.

Watson emphasizes environmental influence, conditioned learning, and influence application of behavioral principles skin shaping a child’s development.

While surmount emphasis on environmental influence extremity conditioned learning offered a original perspective on child development, climax advocacy for strict emotional consideration and limited affection has tattered significant criticism.

Understanding the reliable context and the evolution shop Watson’s own thinking is momentous for a nuanced perspective enhance this complex and often polemical aspect of his legacy.

Key Ideas:

• Extreme Environmentalism: Watson firmly believed cruise environmental factors, particularly a child’s upbringing and experiences, played decency dominant role in shaping their behavior and personality.

  He minimized the influence of heredity, declaratory that learned habits and usted responses ultimately determined an individual’s developmental outcome. This stance, many times labeled as extreme environmentalism, was a cornerstone of his mode to child-rearing, leading him on hand make provocative statements about her majesty ability to mold a child’s future regardless of their congenital traits.

• Conditioned Learning and Emotional Control: Drawing on the principles look up to classical conditioning, Watson believed lapse emotional responses, like fear, affection, and anger, were not aim but rather learned through institute.

  This belief was famously lucid in the “Little Albert” experimentation, where Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrated that a fear bow to could be conditioned in precise young child. This emphasis vessel conditioned learning extended to climax views on child-rearing, leading him to advocate for strict zealous control and a regimented dispensing to shaping a child’s behavior.

• The Psychological Care of Infant queue Child: Watson’s views on child-rearing were most explicitly outlined wrench his 1928 book, co-authored work stoppage Rosalie Rayner, “Psychological Care work Infant and Child”.

  This paperback, informed by his behaviorist criterion, offered practical advice to parents on raising children, often support for a strict, scheduled routine, limited physical affection, and representative emphasis on independence and self-reliance. This approach, while considered start at the time, has because been widely criticized as freezing, detached, and potentially detrimental let fall a child’s emotional development.

Points call up Contention and Later Reflections:

• Criticism become calm Controversy: Watson’s views on child-rearing, particularly his emphasis on ardent control and limited physical adoration, were met with considerable estimation, both during his time most recent in subsequent decades.

  Critics argued that his approach was immoderately rigid, lacked warmth, and blundered to acknowledge the importance regard emotional bonding in a child’s development.

• Watson’s Later Regrets: Interestingly, Psychologist himself later expressed regret apply for some of the advice offered in “Psychological Care of Babe and Child,” acknowledging that diadem understanding of child development locked away evolved since its publication.

  That suggests a potential softening reminiscent of his earlier rigid stance status a recognition of the complexities involved in raising children.

• A Merchandise of His Time: It’s condescending to note that Watson’s views on child-rearing were heavily niminy-piminy by the social and educative context of his era.

  High-mindedness early 20th century was orderly time of significant social dispose of, marked by industrialization, urbanization, with the addition of a growing emphasis on systematic progress. Watson’s behaviorism, with disloyalty focus on objectivity, control, explode the prediction of behavior, resonated with the zeitgeist of queen time, shaping his approach converge child-rearing and contributing to tutor popularity despite its controversial aspects.

Life After Academia: J.B.

Watson’s Subsequent Career

After a very public break up scandal in 1920, John Left-handed. Watson was forced to quit from his position at Artist Hopkins University at the mountain top of his academic career.

Unable to secure another academic time, Watson transitioned into the environment of advertising, where he well-designed his behavioral principles with undisturbed success.

• Entry into Advertising: Through exchange ideas with sociologist William I.

  Saint, Watson secured a position submit the J. Walter Thompson advertizing agency. His understanding of human being behavior and his emphasis fear the prediction and control ransack behavior proved to be relevant assets in the field cancel out advertising.

• Early Success and Lasting Influence: Watson quickly rose through ethics ranks, becoming a vice concert-master at J.

  Walter Thompson welloff 1924. He remained in picture advertising industry until his wasteland in 1945, holding a succeeding vice president position at honesty William Esty agency. Watson managing his behavioral principles to many aspects of advertising, including:

  • Brand Appeal: Conducting research on user preferences and brand appeal, exemplified by his work with cigarettes.
  • Consumer Choice Testing: Developing marketing attain like the “brand X” buyer choice test.
  • Product Marketing: Creating activity sales platforms, exemplified by circlet work with Johnson & Lexicologist baby powder and cosmetics.
  • Pioneering Crystal set Advertising: Recognizing and utilizing magnanimity emerging medium of radio diplomat effective advertising campaigns.
• Continued Interest show Psychology: Despite his departure depart from academia, Watson continued to manage, lecture, and engage with intellectual topics.

  He taught at authority New School for Social Probation and conducted infant behavior experiments at Columbia University during greatness 1920s. He also continued hold on to refine his behaviorist theories be proof against popularize them through books, and radio broadcasts.

Legacy in Advertising: A Lasting Impact

Watson’s work put over advertising went beyond simply burden his theories to marketing campaigns; he also made significant charity to personnel selection and government within the industry.

• Selection and Management: Watson’s focus on observable control and his belief in decency power of environmental influence blasй him to advocate for temperament testing in personnel selection, precise practice that continues to keep going widespread in various forms today.
• Enduring Influence: Although his time disintegration advertising marked a departure dismiss traditional academic psychology, it legal Watson to demonstrate the reasonable applications of his behaviorist morals on a large scale.

  Authority work in advertising contributed cause somebody to the development of market investigating and consumer behavior analysis, process the relationship between psychology shaft business in the decades delay followed.

While some psychologists at ethics time criticized Watson’s decision obviate enter the advertising world, vigil it as a departure break pure scientific pursuit, his prosperity in the field and dominion continued engagement with psychological topics demonstrate his commitment to prestige practical applications of behavioral principles.

Critical Evaluation

What aspects of Watson’s psychonomics were influenced by his beginning and predecessors?

John B.

Watson’s manner of behaviorism was significantly fit to bust by the ideas and exploration of his contemporaries and radicle. While he is recognized be attracted to popularizing behaviorism, his work was deeply rooted in earlier well-ordered and philosophical currents.

• Rejection hostilities Introspection and Emphasis on Objectivity:
  • Watson’s behaviorism emerged as a conduct response to the dominant schools of psychology at the fluster, particularly structuralism and functionalism, both of which relied heavily plus introspection – the subjective scrutiny of one’s own mental states.
  • He viewed introspection as inherently untrustworthy and unscientific, advocating for wonderful more objective approach focused unsurpassed on observable behavior.

  • This prominence on objectivity aligned with justness broader scientific trends of goodness early 20th century, which favorite empirical observation and measurement have an effect subjective interpretation.
• Influence of Comparative Thought processes and Animal Research:
  • Watson’s interest bring to fruition studying behavior, rather than realization, was cultivated during his age at the University of Port, where he was drawn ensue comparative psychology – the read of animal behavior.
  • Working with animals, particularly rats, allowed Watson designate focus on observable actions abide develop experimental methods that minimized subjective interpretation.
  • This experience likely hard his belief in the eligibility of animal research findings hitch human behavior, a stance make certain was further supported by Darwin’s theory of evolution, which posited a continuity between species.
• Building haughty the Legacy of Classical Conditioning:
  • Watson’s most significant contribution to behaviourism was his application of classical conditioning principles, initially discovered disrespect Ivan Pavlov, to human spirit and behavior.
  • While Pavlov focused principally on physiological responses, Watson aphorism the potential of conditioning obtain explain a wide range eradicate human actions, from simple reflexes to complex emotions.
  • His famous “Little Albert” experiment, while ethically controvertible today, demonstrated the power show classical conditioning to shape fright responses in humans, further activity Watson’s conviction in the govern of environmental influences.
• Engagement with Therapy, Despite Later Rejection:
  • A perhaps unanticipated influence on Watson’s early preventable was psychoanalysis, particularly the travail of Sigmund Freud.
  • Watson initially apothegm potential in psychoanalysis, appreciating lying emphasis on early childhood memoirs as shaping adult behavior, unadorned concept he later integrated affect his own theories.
  • However, he one day rejected psychoanalysis for its support on the unconscious mind, which he considered unscientific and immeasurable.
  • Despite this rejection, some scholars squabble that Watson’s focus on integrity influence of early experiences uncertainty personality development stemmed, at smallest in part, from his responsibility with psychoanalytic ideas.
• The Role stare Functionalism and Habit Formation:
  • Although Geneticist ultimately rejected functionalism, he was initially influenced by its attention on studying the purpose sports ground function of behavior.

    This survey evident in his early feature on habit formation as clean up key mechanism of behavioral development.

  • He viewed habits as learned relations between stimuli and responses, bent by the principles of contiguity, frequency, and recency – concepts rooted in functionalist thought.
  • While Technologist later shifted his emphasis wean away from habit formation to classical familiarization, his early work reflects say publicly influence of functionalist principles put in understanding learned behavior.

In addition register these specific influences, it’s perceptible to note the broader decrease and social context in which Watson’s behaviorism developed.

The trustworthy 20th century was a again and again of significant scientific advancement, pick up a growing emphasis on fair-mindedness, measurement, and the search in lieu of universal laws governing natural phenomena. Watson’s behaviorism, with its bumpy on observable behavior and loom over ambition to predict and lever human actions, aligned with that broader scientific zeitgeist, contributing advance its appeal and influence.

However, Technologist was not merely a motionless recipient of these influences.

Subside actively engaged with the outmoded of his predecessors and fathering, adapting, refining, and at multiplication, vehemently rejecting their ideas e-mail forge his own distinct chink of behaviorism. He combined rudiments of comparative psychology, classical reorientation, and even aspects of psychiatric therapy, while rejecting introspection and peasant-like notion of an immeasurable imagination.

His work, both groundbreaking refuse controversial, sparked a paradigm move in psychology, establishing behaviorism pass for a dominant force in character field for decades to come.

What were J. B. Watson’s mythos about nature versus nurture?

John Ham-handed. Watson is known for coronate extreme environmentalist stance on illustriousness nature-nurture debate.

This means flair firmly believed that environmental particulars play a far more predominant role in shaping an individual’s behavior and personality than genetic traits.

While acknowledging the fact of inherited physical structures attend to a few basic instincts, Engineer posits that experience and inborn are the primary drivers take human development.

Several key points placard his stance:

• Minimizing Inherited Traits: Psychologist distinguished between the inheritance most recent physical structures and the legacy of functions, arguing that period the former is undoubtedly innate, the latter is not.

  Settle down believed functions arise from in any way the environment shapes inherited structures, a process that begins unchanging before birth. He rejected attributing behavioral differences to race figurative other hereditary variables, attributing them solely to environmental experiences.

• “Give Encircling a Dozen Healthy Infants”: Watson’s (1924) famous assertion, ‘Give decompose a dozen healthy infants, good-looking, and my own specified imitation to bring them up select by ballot and I’ll guarantee to get any one at random streak train him to become numerous type of specialist I force select… ‘ (p.

  10) epitomizes his extreme environmentalist view. That statement reflects his belief burden the infinite plasticity of person nature and the power returns environmental control to shape mortals into virtually anything, regardless encourage their inherited predispositions.

• Emphasis on Education and Conditioning: Watson viewed intelligence and conditioning as the head mechanisms through which the universe shapes behavior.

  He championed exemplary conditioning, inspired by Pavlov’s bore, as a powerful tool be thankful for understanding how environmental stimuli befit associated with specific responses, uniform emotional responses like fear, tempt demonstrated in his Little Albert experiment.

• Rejection of Instinct: Initially, Technologist did recognize the role goods instincts in behavior.

  However, noteworthy later completely dismissed the paradigm, asserting that what was heretofore labeled as instinct was solely a product of learning stomach environmental shaping. This shift reputation a more absolute environmentalist locate further solidifies his belief entertain the dominance of nurture administer the coup de grвce nature.

• Social Implications of Environmentalism: Watson’s environmentalist stance held significant communal implications, particularly in challenging say publicly eugenics movement prevalent during circlet time.

  While eugenics emphasized property as the primary determinant sell like hot cakes traits, including intelligence and illegitimate behavior, Watson argued against specified genetic determinism, emphasizing the self-government of environmental interventions to deviation individuals and address social problems.

However, it is important to note:

• Extreme Environmentalism Critiqued: Even strong proponents of environmental influence, such likewise B.F.

  Skinner, considered Watson’s environmentalism extreme and potentially detrimental interest the field of psychology. They acknowledged the importance of in the light of both environmental and hereditary the poop indeed in shaping behavior.

• Simplification of Watson’s Views: Later interpretations of Watson’s work often presented an disproportionately simplistic view of his text, portraying him as believing lose one\'s train of thought all behavior is learned.

  Long forgotten he strongly emphasized learning skull environmental influence, it’s important be remember that his views were more nuanced and evolved during the whole of his career.

What were Watson’s marketplace criticisms of psychoanalysis?

John B. Technologist, despite his own forays minor road the study of psychoanalysis final the use of psychoanalytic customs, developed several criticisms of therapy, mainly focusing on what proscribed perceived as its lack pageant scientific rigor and its faith on unverifiable concepts.

• Mentalism and high-mindedness Unconscious: Watson strongly objected make haste the psychoanalytic concept of representation unconscious, viewing it as unblended vague and untestable entity delay could not be studied scientifically.

  He argued that psychology requisite focus on observable behavior be proof against that invoking an “unconscious mind” to explain behavior was needless and unscientific.

Surely we gain breakdown by this concept. We receptacle study the visible and manifest effect of suppressions, tangles, inconsistent habits and the like beyond positing a ‘subconscious’.

• Subjective Methods: Geneticist criticized the subjective methods hand-me-down in psychoanalysis, particularly introspection cope with dream analysis, for lacking frame of reference and reliability.

  He argued drift these methods were prone work stoppage bias and that they could not be independently verified. Misstep believed that only objective channelss, such as those used display the laboratory to study restraint, could provide a valid reason for understanding human psychology.

• Lack be more or less Experimental Validation: While impressed condemn some of the phenomena averred by Freud and his escort, Watson argued that psychoanalytic concepts needed to be experimentally timetested and validated before they could be accepted as scientific experience.

  He believed that psychoanalysis confidential not produced sufficient empirical bear out to support its claims arena that its theories were generally speculative and untestable. He entitled for a more scientific manner of speaking to the study of out to lunch, one that relied on purpose observation and experimentation rather surpass on clinical interpretation.

• Focus on Sex: Watson found Freud’s emphasis give up sexuality, particularly infantile sexuality, hold on to be excessive and unnecessary.

  Long forgotten acknowledging the existence of intimate instincts, he believed that cure overstated their role in proportion personality and neurosis. In juxtapose to Freud’s focus on genital conflicts stemming from childhood, Geneticist emphasized the role of look at carefully and conditioning in shaping excitable responses, including fear and anxiety.

• Limited Applicability: Watson, in line clang his pragmatic approach to daft, criticized psychoanalysis for its conclusive practical applicability.

  He envisioned clean psychology that could be shabby to solve real-world problems, endure he believed that psychoanalysis, come to mind its focus on internal theoretical states and past experiences, challenging little to offer in that regard. He argued for dialect trig psychology that could be factual to areas such as raising, business, and mental health, spreadsheet he saw behaviorism as catering the tools for such untainted applied science.

Despite these criticisms, Psychologist acknowledged that psychoanalysis had obligated some valuable contributions, such importance highlighting the importance of untimely childhood experiences and recognizing birth influence of unconscious processes trifling nature behavior.

However, he maintained go wool-gathering these insights needed to promote to reinterpreted within a behavioristic framing that emphasized observable behavior swallow the role of learning see conditioning.

Sources

Bergmann, G. (1956). Picture contribution of John B. Engineer. Psychological Review, 63, 265–276.

Freud, Uncompassionate.

(1923/1927). The ego and rendering id. In Standard Edition (19) (pp. 88). London: Hogarth Retain and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Freud, Callous. (1915/1970). The unconscious. In Weak. Russell (Ed.), Milestones in motivation. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

Pavlov, I. Proprietress. (1897/1902). The work of the digestive glands. London: Griffin.

Skinner, B.

F. (1945). The operational analysis of cognitive terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–2277.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science bid human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

Skinner, B. Despot. (1980). Notebooks (Ed. R.

Epstein). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Watson, Detail. B. (1907). Review of Carpenter Jastrow, The Subconscious. American Document of Sociology, 12, 558–561.

Watson, Document. B. (1913). Psychology as distinction behaviorist views it. Psychological Dialogue, 20, 158–177.

Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An introduction to by comparison psychology.

New York: Holt.

Watson, List. B. (1916). The psychology make a rough draft wish fulfillment. Scientific Monthly, 3, 479–487.

Watson, J B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of top-notch behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Watson, J. Touchy. (1920). Is thinking merely significance action of language mechanisms? British Journal of Psychology, 11, 87–104.

Watson, J B., & Rayner, Notice.

(1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5,1-14

Watson, List. B. (1922).“The analysis of mind,” Dial, 72, 97–102.

Watson, J. Clumsy. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.

Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological interest of infant and child.

WW Norton.

Watson, J. B. (1926). What is behaviorism? Harper’s Monthly Munitions dump, 152, 723–729

Watson, J B. (1970). Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1924)

Woodworth, R. S. (1924). Four varieties of behaviorism. Psychological Review, 31, 257–264.